Honest Comparison
LogicHive vs. The Enterprise Giants
TestRail, Zephyr, and qTest are built for internal QA departments. LogicHive is built for teams who run UAT with clients.
YOUR BEST FIT
๐
LogicHive
Built for UAT, not QA departments
From ยฃ72.99/month
Flat pricing, unlimited clients
Setup Time
Minutes
Sign up, invite clients, start testing
Strengths
- โMulti-tenant client workspaces
- โClient-friendly interface (no training needed)
- โBuilt-in client collaboration
- โIssue tracking with screenshots
Best For
Software consultancies, agencies, MSPs running UAT with clients
TR
TestRail
Enterprise test case management
$444-888/user/year
Per-seat licensing, annual commitment
Setup Time
Weeks
IT deployment, training, configuration
Strengths
- โComprehensive test case management
- โDeep Jira integration
- โExtensive reporting
- โAPI & automation support
Limitations
- โComplex for non-technical users
- โNo multi-tenant/client model
- โExpensive at scale
Best For
Large QA departments with dedicated test engineers
ZS
Zephyr Scale
Test management inside Jira
$10+/user/month
Can hit $15k+/year for mid-size teams
Setup Time
Days-Weeks
Requires Jira, affects all Jira users
Strengths
- โLives inside Jira
- โGood for dev teams already in Jira
- โTest cycle management
- โAutomation integration
Limitations
- โRequires Jira (lock-in)
- โMust pay for every Jira user
- โClients need Jira access
Best For
Dev teams already deep in Jira ecosystem
qT
qTest
Enterprise unified test platform
~$1,000/user/year
Quote-based, enterprise sales process
Setup Time
Months
Enterprise onboarding, dedicated CSM
Strengths
- โComprehensive test orchestration
- โMultiple modules (Manager, Insights, Launch)
- โStrong automation support
- โCompliance features
Limitations
- โEnterprise pricing & sales cycle
- โComplex module structure
- โSlow feature updates
Best For
Large enterprises with complex compliance needs
Ready to simplify your UAT?
No enterprise sales calls. No complex setup. Just better client testing.